[QUOTE 1945569, member: 76"]I think it's very disappointing that so many people are knocking the flame and the Olympics being in the UK. It's a marvellous thing.
I don't seem to hear complaints of the Cycling World Champs being in the UK. The whole nonsense around the cost, a lot of you doubters are very clever people, you all know that the money would not simply be diverted elsewhere if not into the Olympics. Does anyone think that the country would be awash with nurses, policemen, and new schools and hospitals if we were not hosting the games? Of course not.
As for the whole sponsorship garbage, how many of you 'we must not have sponsorship, it's the Devils own money' spouters are going to turn their backs on the first British Tour winner? After all he is sponsored entirely by big business, Sky, Pinarello, Oakley, Gatorade etc etc Of course none of you are!
Maybe you should just all be thankful that the games coming to London has given you something else to moan about. Now, why not get behind the athletes, of all nations, and let's have a fortnight celebrating success and outstanding sporting achievement.[/quote]
Montreal was paying back the debts for the 1976 Olympics from it's general taxation pool and special taxes on tobacco and other products.until 2006.
The Olympics are a massive loss from the start, especially as they do not include roads, infrastructure etc.
So the present Olympic budget may not be diverted form Hospitals and Police etc, but the debt payments for the next 30 years will have to be found from somewhere!
THe sad fact is that in some way you will be subsidising this from your pockets for at least the next 30 years