[QUOTE 1946137, member: 76"]OK then, so having been corrected on the Montreal points, [/quote]
Corrected?
Which part was corrected?
Was Montreal not paid for by a tax on tobacco and other products?
Was the debt not in existence until 2006?
Or are you in your obvious deeper wisdom than many of the financial experts claiming we will not be paying Olympic debts for a number of years?
If you really think it has "been aid for already"so then it appears that you are simply in denial!
You are aware of the "Olympic council tax levy in London" that is being paid until 2016 (projected)
Sponsorship does not cover the entire costs, and as I posted earlier, the quoted costs do not include the infrastructure such as roads, rail, and other costs which also fall on the tax payer. The £1 billion Olympic Village itself has been built, financed and remains outside the budget and wholly funded by taxpayers.
....you know move on to another subject.
In case you weren't aware, the way a forum works is that people respond to other people. There was a post by yourself which was responded to..... I even quoted it to make that easily understandable!
SO again your claim is a little bizarre as it was your post that moved the thread to the answer I gave!
It's fine not to like the Olympics, but why bang on endlessly? Why not just sit in a dark, joyless room for a fortnight writing a blog or something?
Or simply contribute to a forum by correcting incorrect claims and erroneous posts like yours?