Arch
Married to Night Train
- Location
- Salford, UK
[QUOTE 1945569, member: 76"]IAs for the whole sponsorship garbage, how many of you 'we must not have sponsorship, it's the Devils own money' spouters are going to turn their backs on the first British Tour winner? After all he is sponsored entirely by big business, Sky, Pinarello, Oakley, Gatorade etc etc Of course none of you are!
[/quote]
I'm barely interested in the Tour either, to be honest.
I like the Olympics because it's a chance to see a lot of sports we don't often see. I'm not that bothered who wins. I'm sure we had plenty of facilities suitable without building all new stuff - stadiums were you can't go in wearing the wrong sort of t-shirt. What wonderful Olympic ideals eh?
I heard a chap interviewed on radio a few days ago, who competed in 1948 as a gymnast. No sponsorship, no special diets (unless you count rationing), no multimillion pound opening ceremony. He couldn't even train in a gym, because there weren't any - he practised handstands on hoardings - the nearest they got to advertising I guess! I don't suppose those games were any less special to him and the spectators than this year's will be....
[/quote]
I'm barely interested in the Tour either, to be honest.
I like the Olympics because it's a chance to see a lot of sports we don't often see. I'm not that bothered who wins. I'm sure we had plenty of facilities suitable without building all new stuff - stadiums were you can't go in wearing the wrong sort of t-shirt. What wonderful Olympic ideals eh?
I heard a chap interviewed on radio a few days ago, who competed in 1948 as a gymnast. No sponsorship, no special diets (unless you count rationing), no multimillion pound opening ceremony. He couldn't even train in a gym, because there weren't any - he practised handstands on hoardings - the nearest they got to advertising I guess! I don't suppose those games were any less special to him and the spectators than this year's will be....