I cry BS!
How come?
I cry BS!
A bicycle cannot aquaplane, thus the tread plays no part in water displacement.
Strictly, a slick tyre will give marginally more grip on a wet road than a treaded one because there's more tyre in contact with the road surface.
Strictly, strictly, a bicycle could aquaplane if it went fast enough.
I think Schwalbe estimate 200km/h, or something like that.
So not a worry, even for Froomey in a hurry.
Much more important than the baloney about treads and aquaplaning is the massive potential faux-pas of having the logo on the wrong side of the bike if the tyre only has one logo so the arrow is there to ensure that you don't commit this grave error of style. For example, cognoscenti who use the world's best tyre, the superb Veloflex Open Corsa, will know this and will have the word "Veloflex" visible on the right of the bike and lined up with the valve or 180 degrees opposite, as it should be.
Where did aquaplaning come from? I'm talking about a tread pattern that displaces water?
Where did aquaplaning come from? I'm talking about a tread pattern that displaces water?
Car tyres, read back a few posts.
![]()
As I said, the tread pattern plays no part in displacing water.
On a bicycle, a slick tyre displaces water in the same way as a treaded one.
Thus the tread is irrelevant to water displacement.
No, I don't think a slick tyre would displace water in the same way that a treaded tyre would.