What film did you watch last night?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Webbo2

Über Member
Wake up dead man. Third one in the knives out trilogy. Not bad as I didn’t have go for a wander which I normally do when watching a film.
 

biggs682

Itching to get back on my bike's
Location
Northamptonshire
Tomb raider from 2018 must have been good as we stayed awake
 

nogoodnamesleft

Well-Known Member
Running Man (2025) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Running_Man_(2025_film)

Uninspiring. After an hour my iPad had 90% of my concentration, film only 10% and didn't miss much. Just predictable and by end glad I did some useful stuff on my iPad.

OK, original Schwarzenegger not brilliant but for it's day and as a vehicle for Schwarzenegger it stood-up a lot better than this 2025 version.

What so disappoints me about so many of today's remakes/reboots of films is that there are so many brilliant stories as yet un-filmed why not do something original with something to say rather than some bland "me too" effort that does little more than fill a few hours for TV airtime (one exception being the lastes Dune films which really did have something to add and were brilliant).
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Pblakeney

Über Member
Running Man (2025) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Running_Man_(2025_film)

Uninspiring. After an hour my iPad had 90% of my concentration, film only 10% and didn't miss much. Just predictable and by end glad I did some useful stuff on my iPad.

OK, original Schwarzenegger not brilliant but for it's day and as a vehicle for Schwarzenegger it stood-up a lot better than this 2025 version.

What so disappoints me about so many of today's remakes/reboots of films is that there are so many brilliant stories as yet un-filmed why not do something original with something to say rather than some bland "me too" effort that does little more than fill a few hours for TV airtime (one exception being the lastes Dune films which really did have something to add and were brilliant).

From what I've heard the 2025 movie version is more faithful to the original book than the Arnie version so it could be claimed that they were trying to "fix" it. Also supposedly it is amazing how Stephen King could see today's circumstances in the 70s. Not seen it so don't know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

nogoodnamesleft

Well-Known Member
Running Man (2025) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Running_Man_(2025_film)

Uninspiring. After an hour my iPad had 90% of my concentration, film only 10% and didn't miss much. Just predictable and by end glad I did some useful stuff on my iPad.

OK, original Schwarzenegger not brilliant but for it's day and as a vehicle for Schwarzenegger it stood-up a lot better than this 2025 version.

What so disappoints me about so many of today's remakes/reboots of films is that there are so many brilliant stories as yet un-filmed why not do something original with something to say rather than some bland "me too" effort that does little more than fill a few hours for TV airtime (one exception being the lastes Dune films which really did have something to add and were brilliant).
From what I've heard the 2025 movie version is more faithful to the original book than the Arnie version so it could be claimed that they were trying to "fix" it. Also supposedly it is amazing how Stephen King could see today's circumstances in the 70s. Not seen it so don't know.
I heard the same which made me think about the purpose of fictional films. Are they about faithfully recreating a fictional story or about entertainment based around an idea? If it isn't entertaining does it matter that it's faithful to an author's writings? If it is entertaining does it matter is it tells a slightly different story than that from a book?

My impression is that generally fiction books are more complex than the film version or rather that the film version simplifies the story from the book. Again Dune is a good example as those attempts that try to include too much from the book become hopelessly complex for most audiences. Even the 2 (becoming 3) part recent very long film versions omit vast aspects from the book (though done well they still tell a good story).
 
  • Like
Reactions: C R

Pblakeney

Über Member
I heard the same which made me think about the purpose of fictional films. Are they about faithfully recreating a fictional story or about entertainment based around an idea? If it isn't entertaining does it matter that it's faithful to an author's writings? If it is entertaining does it matter is it tells a slightly different story than that from a book?
I don't think it is important. Different is just different and subjective. Some will prefer the original, some the remake. No right or wrong.
FWIW in my view the book and film Jaws are both very good, and both very different.
 
If it isn't entertaining does it matter that it's faithful to an author's writings? If it is entertaining does it matter is it tells a slightly different story than that from a book?

My impression is that generally fiction books are more complex than the film version or rather that the film version simplifies the story from the book.
Good luck with this fella - I've been saying the same since ... well probably since internet fora emerged. And believe me, my view is NOT popular ...
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
The Third Man

Plinky plinky plink ti-plink.

And here is the actual source of the plinky plinky plink on display in a museum in Vienna. Really quite cool to see the actual zither as played by Anton Karas himself. i

IMG_0009.jpeg

We didn't quite make it to the big wheel and I'm not aware if there's a sewer tour, but did fit in some culture

IMG_0004.jpeg


IMG_0003.jpeg


IMG_0008.jpeg
 
Top Bottom