Yeah, but I don't know why my GP is not considered professional enough (I'm a rare visitor) to provide an unbiased report. All that will happen is that the 'independent' will request details from the GP to write a report that he'll charge for. Unnecessary bureaucracy.
That's how it is...there is a specific database of clinicians who undertake medico-legal reporting which the other side will require. They may even request you to see their own chose medico-legal clinician as well. You will likely need to go see them for a thorough examination. If you are claiming psychological impact too, you may also need to see a psychologist for a detailed assessment.Yeah, but I don't know why my GP is not considered professional enough (I'm a rare visitor) to provide an unbiased report. All that will happen is that the 'independent' will request details from the GP to write a report that he'll charge for. Unnecessary bureaucracy.
Yes they do (as do British Cycling/LCC)...the OP isn't a member of said organisations thoughI believe, maybe wrongly, that as I am a member of Cycling UK they fight my corner if in the unlikely event that I get twatted. I'm pretty sure it is a thing though.
If you do get summoned to see their quack make damn sure you stiff them for any travel expenses and your time. Make sure that you also bring a 'friend', which you are lawfully entitled to do and which the BMA positively encourages, and that you record the consultation. Doctors hate you doing it, but you are lawfully entitled to do so andp if the doctor gets sniffy a complaint to the BMA will see them officially censured.That's how it is...there is a specific database of clinicians who undertake medico-legal reporting which the other side will require. They may even request you to see their own chose medico-legal clinician as well. You will likely need to go see them for a thorough examination. If you are claiming psychological impact too, you may also need to see a psychologist for a detailed assessment.
Both parties will also demand your medical records be released by the GP back to the year dot (and yes, the GP will charge for that but you won't pay...unless you lose).
If they've accepted liability, why are you going through the small claims court? Isn't it just a matter now of negotiating an acceptable settlement. The amounts are determined by case law not a finger in the air based on your circumstance/injuries
Again, this is why it's far better to engage a solicitor specialist in cycling RTC injuries as advised. The law is based on bureaucracy...and PI claims are very thorough as unfortunately there are lots of fraudulent shysters out there claiming for injuries that don't exist etc (hence the thorough medical assessment process to discourage the shysters or catch them out)! (and also less than honest medics willing to state things that aren't entirely true let's say)
It's a pain for genuine claimants but it is as it is
I'd be asking who's going to pay the independent medical assessment*. Don't be afraid to ask the question of them.Yeah, but I don't know why my GP is not considered professional enough (I'm a rare visitor) to provide an unbiased report. All that will happen is that the 'independent' will request details from the GP to write a report that he'll charge for. Unnecessary bureaucracy.
I had 3 medical assessments during my claim (over about 3 years), they were all organised by an agency engaged by the solicitor.
do you have legal cover on your home insurance, or any sort of assistance programme through your employer or union? Maybe they can offer support.
it’s not yet April, can’t you get the ball moving through the SCC?
Certain,No legal cover, but I will have in the future!
Indeed if they’ve accepted liability. You just need to go through the process and then negotiatehttps://www.jspubs.com/expert-witness/si/i/insurance-industry/
&
https://witnessdirectory.com/categories.php?toe=1&country=UK
Why are you going through the courts to claim from the insurance company.