PaulB said:May I just say I didn't start this thread. It was a posting on another thread about cats which one of "the owners" has decided should be a thread of its own.
However, I stand by my original point that cats are a bit pathetic. If we were to take the dog as the default position of a loyal and true companion, then a cat would have to be considered the autistic brother/sister of the family. So yes, you could say I'm not feline pleasantly disposed to them.
PaulB said:Is it just me or are cats shoot? What is their purpose? A dog might rescue its owners from a fire by alerting them at night while a cat would run away and find another soft touch to take it in. We got one as we were starting to get field mice coming in but the cat is bone idle and I fail to see what it gives us back for the constant take, take, take. We lost it over the weekend and I've just found it on the other side of the garden fence whining and too stupid to realise it could turn round and walk out of the bush it had become trapped in. I was hoping we'd seen the last of it but no. I feel cats have become superfluous to requirements in the 21st century and unless anyone can tell me what earthly good they are, I'm going to propose a mass cull.
bonj said:Good point. But you could equally ponder - what is the point in, say, kids?
Well said +1goo_mason said:<grump_on>
The original thread was from a concerned cat owner asking for advice. I'm not surprised that the Mods split the less pleasant anti-cat stuff onto its own thread; your posting on there showed a complete lack of empathy and was pretty insensitive. If it was supposed to be funny, it was misplaced humour. You weren't alone either with some ill-timed and ill-thought-out thread spoiling there from others who probably ought to know a bit better.
As the owner of a well-loved cat, who's now in her 18th year and starting to get a bit frayed around the edges, I'm pleased about the thread move. You can be as insensitive as you like here, but it leaves us cat-owners to give advice on the original.
</grump_on>
goo_mason said:<grump_on>
your posting on there showed a complete lack of empathy and was pretty insensitive. If it was supposed to be funny, it was misplaced humour. You weren't alone either with some ill-timed and ill-thought-out thread spoiling there from others who probably ought to know a bit better.
</grump_on>
peanut said:thank GB you for saying what everyone was thinking about these insensitive posts.
I suppose every net community has its share insensitive and callous members . Fortunately careful and sensitive moderation on here has prevented them from spoiling this community for everyone else.
I find it strange that some members can be so deliberately rude hurtful and insensitive to others when those same people they are upsetting would gladly offer any help ,advice and support to them in spite of their insentive behaviour and comments
Heres another one of PaulB's recent insensitive posts
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=41576
another
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=42026
and here is a rascist one
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=42371
does this community need a member like PaulB ?
peanut said:thank GB you for saying what everyone was thinking about these insensitive posts.
Heres another one of PaulB's recent insensitive posts
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=41576
another
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=42026
and here is a rascist one
http://www.cyclechat.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=42371
does this community need a member like PaulB ?
galaxy1 said:Whats the point of anything?Whats the point of people? And do things even need a point?