Ian H
Ancient randonneur
But breaking down uprights has given ridiculously small numbers. Your argument doesn’t hold water.
Who says 'tourer' (for instance) refers only to upright?
But breaking down uprights has given ridiculously small numbers. Your argument doesn’t hold water.
That could be interesting, but you aren't really going to get it from a poll like this, where 3 out of 96 are riding recumbents.
You really need a separate thread for that, in the recumbents section of the forum.
Absolutely, red ones are always faster!Why aren't the categories subdivided by colour? That would make much more sense.![]()
Who says 'tourer' (for instance) refers only to upright?
Many uprights could also do all of those. At least "light" off road, plus racing & touring. You might want to change the tyres for different purposes.One would question whether a particular recumbent model could fall into such a classification, and exactly what it meant. It tends to be road bikes that are put into narrow classifications such as tourer. A single recumbent could do racing, touring, off road etc etc.
One could argue that an upright racer is just a poorly designed restricted upright tourer.
Racy midwife?
me neither - count yourself lucky - such bikes didn't exist until pretty recently.
One would question whether a particular recumbent model could fall into such a classification, and exactly what it meant. It tends to be road bikes that are put into narrow classifications such as tourer. A single recumbent could do racing, touring, off road etc etc.
One could argue that an upright racer is just a poorly designed restricted upright tourer.
I recall a guy called Zac riding something similar to this in the 99 PBP - not a tourer, I think you'd agree.![]()
View attachment 671791
I don’t think this is a tourer either 🤣