lazybloke
Ginger biscuits and cheddar
- Location
- Leafy Surrey
I've not noticed any child-repelling noises in my neck of the woods (apart from the word "homework") but I find mole repellers annoying - maybe a similar frequency?
Jasper Carrot on a swivel chair with a shotgun and a torch?I've not noticed any child-repelling noises in my neck of the woods (apart from the word "homework") but I find mole repellers annoying - maybe a similar frequency?
It's indiscriminate and can hurt babies who will suffer but not be able to communicate their discomfort.
It should be banned.
Well, there's always this.....Suppose their intention is to preserve as much of the signal as possible rather than degrading it further, but feel free to ridicule your acquaintances if they take that concept too far.
Or try some exploitation : Flog them some premium HDMI cables and other digital interconnects to ensure those 0s and 1s are in fine shape.
Actually my goal is just to disappoint you.Let me get this straight, on a thread about children and 'yoof' you are actually saying care and consideration should be given to how they're treated? No reason for an indiscriminate approach like this, there was nothing wrong with the birch.
I thought you were the successful type, didn't realise you were one of these commie, leftie, pinko, liberal whackjobs...I'm disappointed.
Or maybe he's way more perceptive than you are.If you think that will upset them I think you are insulting them & more misogynistic than I am (if I am at all), however this is now way way off topic
The worst case was a pair of high quality loudspeaker cables costing £500 to replace a pair of high quality loudspeaker cables which had cost £50 ...With audio cables there is a point at which the cable is 'good enough', this is when the connectors are well made, the wire is of a high enough quality and the insulation/shielding is adequate. Beyond that you're chasing very small improvements at very high cost.
Are they equivalent? I've always abhorred 'the' wife/missus/whatever, but on account of the 'the', not whatever word was attached. I use 'my missus' sometimes, and 'er indores for that matter, but there's nothing dodgy about it. It's affectionate, not slighting. 'My wife' feels, to me at least, rather dry and formal for, say, chat among quasi (but in truth strangers) friends; it's the terminology I would use in an official context. Do I really have to use 'My wife' every time, for fear of being called a misogynist? Seems a tad po-faced/over-earnest to me. But then I am 104.Instead of youth scarers, can we please just have a device that instantly vaporises anyone who uses the phrase 'my/ the Missus'
Are they equivalent? I've always abhorred 'the' wife/missus/whatever, but on account of the 'the', not whatever word was attached. I use 'my missus' sometimes, and 'er indores for that matter, but there's nothing dodgy about it. It's affectionate, not slighting. 'My wife' feels, to me at least, rather dry and formal for, say, chat among quasi (but in truth strangers) friends; it's the terminology I would use in an official context. Do I really have to use 'My wife' every time, for fear of being called a misogynist? Seems a tad po-faced/over-earnest to me. But then I am 104.
I can hear very little above 5 kHz, but worse than that is the fact that I effectively have a comb filter eliminating certain lower frequency sounds altogether. I used to work with one person whose speaking voice happened to hit some of my dodgy frequencies. When I was in project meetings it became a bit of a farce because I could understand what all the other people were saying but had to keep asking him to raise or lower his pitch so I could hear him. He would remember for a few sentences but would drift back to his natural pitch and to me it was like he had then stopped speaking.Interesting. 12,500ish for me. At 56.