classic33
Leg End Member
That's not for you or me to decide though.They are twats, unless part of the emergency services carrying out their duties. Even though not all speed limits are appropriate.
That's not for you or me to decide though.They are twats, unless part of the emergency services carrying out their duties. Even though not all speed limits are appropriate.
That's not for you or me to decide though.
I was reading about the 'eco marathon'.
Seems the eco driving record is 15,200 mpg. Average speed was 18.6 mph. So, was that 56mph thing a lie?
Via wiki, https://web.archive.org/web/2006072...s.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=43581
No. The majority of cars were designed to be most efficient at around that speed. The record breaking car was a special design, very different to the average family car.
Though I'm not sure that modern cars are significantly more efficient at that sort of speed than they are at lower constant speeds. They will still be a lot more fuel efficient at a constant 56 than in stop-start traffic, but won't be much less efficient at a constant 30 than at a constant 56.
56mph being most efficient has been debunked many times. It was just one of the benchmarks used in an old UK fuel economy test.I was reading about the 'eco marathon'.
Seems the eco driving record is 15,200 mpg. Average speed was 18.6 mph. So, was that 56mph thing a lie?
Via wiki, https://web.archive.org/web/2006072...s.com/content_pages/record.asp?recordid=43581
No looks at wattage at differing cycling speeds. It is only aerodynamics that stop cars having the same hirrendous exponential efficiency loss as the bicycle. However the increasing loss is still there I am sure.
Mathematically, drag created by air resistance increases as the velocity squared. However, the power or energy expenditure to overcome resistance during cycling increases as the velocity cubed. Thus, as velocity increases, an exponentially greater level of power must be produced in order to attain that speed.
From google
Google is wrong.
A cubic law is not exponential.
Google is wrong.
A cubic law is not exponential.
Dredging from dark recesses of memory...Yes it is.
Exponential just means that the rate of increase keeps increasing.
So even a square function is exponential, never mind a cube function.