and where is Droid looking? is his attention focussed on the child about to step out into the road in front of him? Or on the red card and the car behind.
Watch the image on Matt's head cam on many of his videos, he give a very long look at the driver behind, or who has turned off instead of the road ahead while himself riding on at pace.
Each of them has too much focus on the camera (Ha!) and their future up load instead of the road ahead.
A driver turns over the station on the radio or looks in their wing mirror, attention is diverted. It is implausible to expect one to divert 100% solid attention to that of which is ahead of them all of the time. You pick you're moments having considered all other plausible risks.
Naturally when someone toots at me I look behind to see what they want. He managed to pull out his red card as well.
Checking over the video no one was crossing so unless I missed this person, I find the point invalid. Mainly due to the fact that he well could have looked forward to monitor in front of him to check for risks then proceeded to give the red card. The camera does not show where his eyes are looking so this is all speculation. On top of that even if he were to look down what is in front of him very well could still remain within his peripheral vision . Unless you of course are going to make the point that one should not look anywhere other than in front of them in case of a random child is about to step out.
If you even want to travel BS alley he could have used the time while giving the red card to assess the situation with the taxi driver and to decide what the next best action is to possibly improve the situation.
The same principle of your argument could be applied to a situation where a rider shoulder checks to change lanes and a random mythical kid runs out in front. So do you expect that he should just change lane without looking in case this speculative child runs out? The answer is of course not.
I'm not a fan of the droid but your point is feeble boarderline stupid.