glasgowcyclist
Charming but somewhat feckless
- Location
- Scotland
What would they do in that case? S&G can’t represent both parties (that’s the reason for the BC policy)
I'm guessing nothing since you'll have no cover.
What would they do in that case? S&G can’t represent both parties (that’s the reason for the BC policy)
CUK member here, since I,m car free. £40 a year is worth it. I mainly use Cotswold for my discounts .
So why go with CUK over BC? I don't get the differenceI'm guessing nothing since you'll have no cover.
£35 vs £100k I failed maths but can work this one out.
So why go with CUK over BC? I don't get the difference
Yes. Up into the 40s now for Ride cover. You get a bit off for auto renewal I thinkDoes the insurance cost for BC go up every year? £35 or £39 seems slightly on the high side but probably worth getting.
But I wonder if this is bait price and then it is increased in subsequent years?
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/b...ip-is-it-worth-the-£35-10.235808/post-5657485What got me thinking about this thread was a certain yoga teacher who has been in the news lately while crossing the road staring at her phone yet the cyclist has to pay out.
Liability Insurance and Legal Assistance So this is really all I'm buying it for, but in the 50 years I've been riding a bike I've never got into a situation where this has been needed. But that's not so say I won't tomorrow.