Tynan said:this is the most placid board I've ever seen barring you two with all respect, zim and lin, you're both aggressive and dogmatic and worse do it in concert, I think that's something of animal's point
spindrift said:These two charlies have now infected a helpful, constructive part of the site. linford and zimzum drag their petty quarrels into quiet backwaters of the forum and disrupt, insult and obsess about whatever their own concerns are. They're ruining the forum, new posters will be discouraged by the unpleasant abuse that follows these two around, that's a great shame.
BentMikey said:Can't say it popped up on my radar, at least by comparison with some of your rants. LLB, fair enough, he's on my ignore list.
spindrift said:They're ruining the forum, new posters will be discouraged by the unpleasant abuse that follows these two around, that's a great shame.
linfordlunchbox said:Back to the title of the title of this thread. This report claimed positive benefits for cyclists and pedestrians by allowing motorcycles into the bus lanes but apparently Red Ken suppressed prior to being voted out as he is well known for his dislike for motorcycles.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/main.jhtml?xml=/motoring/2008/01/26/mflane126.xml
Origamist said:Seemingly it did, but when the methodological flaws (particularly with regard to data gathering and exposure rates) were highlighted, the reports' findings were no longer credible.
spindrift said:We've covered this in depth, lengthy explanations about the A13 trial have been posted already llb's seen all that research and now asks the same old questions agian in the hope that someone's gullible enough to engage with him and ruin yet another thread.
Origamist said:Sorry, I forgot that that's your job.
Origamist said:Sorry, I forgot that that's your job.