col
Legendary Member
Ok enlarge the pic, I couldnt see a phone in one, just a hand on his head. I dont believe you will be able to show a phone no matter how large the pic is.Van one is CLEAR
Van 2- fair nuff
Ok enlarge the pic, I couldnt see a phone in one, just a hand on his head. I dont believe you will be able to show a phone no matter how large the pic is.Van one is CLEAR
Van 2- fair nuff
How did him looking at oncoming traffic and noticing two drivers who where on their phones whilst he was waiting to turn right across their paths equate to him not concentrating?Comcentrate on what you are doing not on what others might be doing.So you think that one driver was on the phone and one was textung - how did that affect you?
Objection, it hasnt yet been shown that there were phones in use.How did him looking at oncoming traffic and noticing two drivers who where on their phones whilst he was waiting to turn right across their paths equate to him not concentrating?
This would depend on the assumption being made in actual time or viewing the vid ?Comcentrate on what you are doing not on what others might be doing.So you think that one driver was on the phone and one was textung - how did that affect you?
So if there aren't phones, does that mean he wasn't concentrating enough on what the drivers where holding and as such was concentrating more on the traffic and when he can turn which as a result proves Mr H's point more absurd.Objection, it hasnt yet been shown that there were phones in use.
Im not sure what that means, but can you see the phones in question?So if there aren't phones, does that mean he wasn't concentrating enough on what the drivers where holding and as such was concentrating more on the traffic and when he can turn which as a result proves Mr H's point more absurd.
Ill repeat where is the assumption made ?So if there aren't phones, does that mean he wasn't concentrating enough on what the drivers where holding and as such was concentrating more on the traffic and when he can turn which as a result proves Mr H's point more absurd.
Ere wait your turn for cross examinationIll repeat where is the assumption made ?
Well you said that Mr H posts sensible comments, I'm showing by the use of logic, that he does not.Im not sure what that means, but can you see the phones in question?
The assumption of what exactly? I saw your post to Mr H but i'm not sure if you are referencing the drivers concentration or gaz's?Ill repeat where is the assumption made ?
Well you said that Mr H posts sensible comments, I'm showing by the use of logic, that he does not.
But can you see the phones??? I think not.
The assumption of what exactly? I saw your post to Mr H but i'm not sure if you are referencing the drivers concentration or gaz's?
The concentration thing was first pointed out by Mr H and it was aimed at gaz.
I can't comment on your comment, as it is in my quote.
OkI can't comment on your comment, as it is in my quote.
Mobile phone usage doesn't show up on camera very well, especially if the vehicle is moving - I guess the glass reflections cause problems even if we can see it perfectly.
ok i'll answer it. There is not a clear image of either driver holding a phone in my opinion.
If you could show me the phones they were doing this on, i would agree.