FishFright
More wheels than sense
Have you seen it?
The fire a laser at it regularly to measure it's slowly increasing orbit. But who is driving away the moon and for what reason are they doing it *???
* Pick your own they
Have you seen it?
I didn't hazard a guess I took the numbers off NASA's websiteAnd would you like to hazard a guess at how much fuel a Saturn V rocket carried?
Nonsense. There is no 'fuel' involved. It's all done with compressed air. Just like jet areoplanes use compressed air. All this stuff about aviation fuel is just a con.And would you like to hazard a guess at how much fuel a Saturn V rocket carried?
There is insufficient proof that in the 60's that the Americans had enough technology to fake the moon landings. They actually did have the technology to go to the moon.No there is insufficient proof that in the 60's that the Merkins had enough technology to build the rockets to get to the moon, the one that I really do not understand is they would need over 750,000 gallons of fuel according to NASA but surely the fuel tanks weren't big enough
Capricorn One.If Hollywood made a movie about it, it’s true and I believe!!
Complete Occam's Razor fail. It's all about website hits and unfortunately, I've just added one to that sum.
Why did some of the crew sail only as far as Southampton.There have been several documentaries looking into the cause of the disaster. One of them said that the Titanic had a serious fire in one of it's coal bunker's and set sail with the fire still burning . I tend to believe this documentary to be closer to the truth than some of the others.
Delivered by Elliot.Why put a newspaper on the moon?
Burning before they left Belfast.I'm pretty convinced there was a fire in one of the coal bunkers.
Probably ignited when they loaded it, spark/pressure ignition of the coal-dust.Burning before they left Belfast.
It's why they keep turning it, even today, when it's in large piles.Probably ignited when they loaded it, spark/pressure ignition of the coal-dust.