numbnuts
Squire
- Location
- Gone over the hill and far away
I bet now this won't be the last time we hear “wanton and furious driving” mainly aimed at cyclists
18 months out in 9 or less
18 months out in 9 or less
It makes you wonder if the Judiciary view a 'short' custodial sentence as being comparable to points and a ban. If there were cycling licences, and I trust there never will be, would he have been given points, a fine and a ban instead?It does feel like he has been held to a higher standard than would be expected of a motorist.
3/4 of the maximum I believe. I feel like few motorists would get that for "Causing death by..."It does feel like he has been held to a higher standard than would be expected of a motorist.
I'm not a fan of prison - it's usually a way of making a bad person worse. But I think this is richly deserved. I hope he gets some insight into his behaviour while he's inside.Too harsh and, hateful a person as so many found him, do we think those 18 months are going to create an improvement?
http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/l...ies-ramming-tree-faces-five-years-jail-329795It does feel like he has been held to a higher standard than would be expected of a motorist.
No. For me not a case of too harsh but rather a case that had he been driving he would have likely got less....Too harsh and, hateful a person as so many found him, do we think those 18 months are going to create an improvement?
If there were parity between the way in which we consider motoring offences and the "equivalent" cycling offences, I am sure that he would be able to claim "exceptional hardship" and escape the banIt makes you wonder if the Judiciary view a 'short' custodial sentence as being comparable to points and a ban. If there were cycling licences, and I trust there never will be, would he have been given points, a fine and a ban instead?
http://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/...ausing-death-by-driving-dangerously-1-50133993/4 of the maximum I believe. I feel like few motorists would get that for "Causing death by..."
You're drawing a comparison with a motorist who used her vehicle as a weapon? Seriously? More realistic would be "death by careless driving" as there is no suggestion of intent on the part of Mr Alliston. As I've said before, I know someone who was convicted of that last year... do you suppose he's in prison?I'm not a fan of prison - it's usually a way of making a bad person worse. But I think this is richly deserved. I hope he gets some insight into his behaviour while he's inside.
http://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/l...ies-ramming-tree-faces-five-years-jail-329795
Five years for serious injuries - a driver. For example. "Motorist seriously injures someone and is jailed" just isn't news.
The court will have used standard sentencing guidelines. The fact he was on a bike rather than in a car or wielding a hammer would have been deemed irrelevant.
It's news because it's rare. It's not the norm.If there were parity between the way in which we consider motoring offences and the "equivalent" cycling offences, I am sure that he would be able to claim "exceptional hardship" and escape the ban
As googling counter-examples is all too easy I continue to feel like few motorists would get 18 months for "Causing death by..."http://www.kilburntimes.co.uk/news/...ausing-death-by-driving-dangerously-1-5013399
Five years. For instance.
http://www.scottishlegal.com/2015/0...erous-driving-has-sentence-reduced-on-appeal/
Nine years. For instance.
http://www.cps.gov.uk/westmidlands/cps_west_midlands_news/motorist-jailed-for-causing-the-dea/
Four-and-a-half years. For instance.
(Yes, we can all google counter-examples.)
Precisely this. It's normalised in our society, and this is reflected in the sentencing. And we all know how rarely a "dangerous driving" conviction is secured, as opposed to the lesser "careless driving".As googling counter-examples is all too easy I continue to feel like few motorists would get 18 months for "Causing death by..."
I'll add "hereabouts". It may be different elsewhere.As googling counter-examples is all too easy I continue to feel like few motorists would get 18 months for "Causing death by..."
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.u...ing_death_by_driving_definitive_guideline.pdfYou're drawing a comparison with a motorist who used her vehicle as a weapon? Seriously? More realistic would be "death by careless driving" as there is no suggestion of intent on the part of Mr Alliston. As I've said before, I know someone who was convicted of that last year... do you suppose he's in prison?
Do we? Do we really? Or do we just assume we do because of what gets reported by the press?Precisely this. It's normalised in our society, and this is reflected in the sentencing. And we all know how rarely a "dangerous driving" conviction is secured, as opposed to the lesser "careless driving".
As an old boss used to say "We've all got a ****ing story".The Guardian story alludes to Alliston having lost his father aged 15 and been in an 'emotionally flat' state since
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeand...jailed-for-18-months-over-death-of-pedestrian