jayonabike
Powered by caffeine & whisky
- Location
- Hertfordshire
Trees. They don't have lights. Or hedges. And I haven't hit one yet. Must be witchcraft.
not even a helmet!Was he wearing hi-viz?
....or a tree surgeon.Trees. They don't have lights. Or hedges. And I haven't hit one yet. Must be witchcraft.
And if you fined them for having no lights the out cry would be “police state”
Trees. They don't have lights. Or hedges. And I haven't hit one yet. Must be witchcraft.
I'm sure the guy who smacked into another car with only one light because he thought it was a bike or motorbike wouldn't have thought it was "correct".Exactly
We had a local newspaper article where Police clamped down
10% were bad enough to be taken off the road
The problem was that this was heavy handed and the "correct" method was a quiet word. Rather than issuing improvement notices and fines
Not sure I understand....I'm sure the guy who smacked into another car with only one light because he thought it was a bike or motorbike wouldn't have thought it was "correct".
I'm sure the guy who smacked into another car with only one light because he thought it was a bike or motorbike wouldn't have thought it was "correct".
If a car is close enough to hit a car with a light out 'thinking it was a bike/motorbike' then IMO it was too close if it HAD been a bike/motorbike.
Trees. They don't have lights. Or hedges. And I haven't hit one yet. Must be witchcraft.
I think you are talking about Intelligent trees which are indeed dangerous.Despite being s good 8' from the carriageway they were deemed a hazard to vehicles
Describe how this happens
Sorta like a cyclops?Maybe we should all drive about with one light then.