classic33
Leg End Member
Try riding two abreast, let alone three.I was thinking a different meaning of laid back, good point.
Try riding two abreast, let alone three.I was thinking a different meaning of laid back, good point.
You don't have to talk if you don't wish to. I enjoy the banter though and CTC clubs don't insist on helmets. I think thats a British Cycling club thing.I mainly ride with my husband. He is a bit stronger and faster than me but it evens out over a distance because i ride more (to work) so am a bit fitter with more stamina.
I also occasionally ride with a female friend who is a marathon runner and much fitter than me but only rides a bike occasionally so we are evenly matched.
I also ride a fair bit on my own.
Thought about joining a club but don't think i can be bothered with small talk or being forced to wear a helmet.
It's rule number one my local club's website "no helmet, no ride"You don't have to talk if you don't wish to. I enjoy the banter though and CTC clubs don't insist on helmets. I think thats a British Cycling club thing.
I, for some reason find it hard to ride slower than my usual pace. I'll sit and chat with a slower rider but i do struggle after a while. I was the same when I used to run with somebody. If we were not close in pace I struggled. Fast or slow I must add.i much prefer been a loner when on the bike, although some times my dad or my sisters boyfriend comes out with me, although theres a lot more stops when with other people i don't mind and happy just to match their speed and let them go in front so im not constantly checking behind me to see if their keeping up ok
+1 to this; that being the reason why I spent a not insignificant amount of cash on a new carbon framed bike a few months ago. To me that meant less effort to get up the hills, of which there are plenty around here, and possibly just a more comfortable ride. To my mate, it meant I had become a Bradley Wiggins wannabe and of course I would now want to go out with him and no longer be happy with my "time has no meaning" style of cycling. He was wrong!I am not interested in going faster either. but I am pretty keen on going at the same speed with less work.
Our club rides are at a leisurely 13-14 mph. Very pleasant, but one reason why we’re now struggling to attract new members as many ‘modern’ cyclists see these long, slowish rides to a lunch destination as pedestrian and old fashioned.
I agree with this. I have four adult children and five grandchildren with another due very soon. They all live within about 500yds of me. Hence disappearing for a full day on a Sunday on the bike does not always go down very well. 15 birthday parties to attend plus confirmations, Baptisms, Communions and any other celebration my brood can think of, throw bad weather into the mix and all day club runs are becming a rare event. But head down 60 miles races to be back for lunch is something I will be happy to miss.I read somewhere this is evidence of social change.
Years ago, the Sunday club ride was as you describe and it would take most of the day.
Competing attractions such as shopping/drinking/sport, and more older cyclists (MAMILs) with children who want to do things on Sunday afternoon mean the club ride needs to get back not long after midday.
The riders still want the miles, hence turning the ride into a three or four hour sprint.
There are loads I bet, you have not tried hard to find them.