Why should I believe the article? Why do you believe it? Do you see a source quoted anywhere?
You don't have to believe anything. Just compile a list of Ti frames that are constructed from 6Al-4V tubing, and those that are constructed from 3Al-2.5V tubing, and see which is the longer list.
My argument is based on the fact that most structural titanium is of a specific type. It is the industry's bread-and-butter alloy.
Indeed, but there are good reasons why 3Al-2.5V is the dominant alloy in bicycle frames, even if small parts such as dropouts may be 6Al-4V.
http://www.sevencycles.com/buildingbike/techsupplement/ti.php
@Pale Rider may find the above link informative ^^^
Further, who said that welded steel frames do not suffer from cracks? I certainly didn't, but I do understand the role of lugs and how they are fitted to frame tubes and how working with them avoids exceeding the heat limits of CroMo steel.
Nice diversion, but my point was that you said in a previous post that fracture toughness had been sorted on steel frames by the use of lugs. Which of course was largely irrelevant, because lugged construction is now pretty much exclusively the preserve of custom builds.
Oh, and by the way, my lugged, steel, Trek 990 frame died of a crack in the top tube where the head tube lug ended. So you see, lugs can act as stress raisers, and crack initiation sites. I took the frame to a Trek dealer, with the magnetic particle inspection powder from work still present along the crack line, and they ordered me a new frame as a warranty claim.
But I guess for every answer you'll have another question
The answer is for you to stop posting incorrect and irrelevant content..........
like a child of certain age.
..........and have a bit of respect for people instead of posting insults.