Absolutely not. I think people should attempt to respect the choices others make for whatever reason they do. The argument put across here is there is no justification for having a couple of cars whilst living in a terrace house, and I say different and presented a perfectly plausible argument which many households will face down there. - some middle class cyclist spouts about the kids living there not being able to own a car which they buy and pay all the bills on because they sometimes have to park outside a neighbours house because dad drives for a living and also keeps his car in the street. If I were them I'd say go spin on it.....about 45rpm![]()
No worries... I'm just jealous because we haven't got space on the drive for Tarquin's and Ffion's cars in a couple of years.![]()
So you shifted your problem elsewhere then, but will stand in judgement now over the residents there ?
No, not a problem. he couldn't park outside his house so he parked legally elsewhere.
I used to live on a terraced street, In Doncaster and pretty close to a mosque too.....sometimes I couldn't park my car outside the house, sometimes I couldn't park it on the same street. Simple, park it legally a few streets away.
There was a point where I aspired to motorised personal transport, but I was at my parents, money was tight, parking was tight etc. I got a moped, then a motorbike.
BTW. I wonder at these deprived areas and the legality of the cars there. I remember a few months ago a piece of research quoting Bradford and Birmingham as being capitals of vehicles which weren't road legal (can't remember if that was based on insurance or VED). A few years earlier it was Sheffields Manor top quoted as having the biggest concentration of non taxed vehicles. Maybe a blitz on these would reduce the problem?
No, you're assumption is it's a problem. Why's it a problem?And this gives someone else your problem......
Uniquely so I suspect!
That is why there are now so many resident's parking schemes and controlled parking areas.
In most residential areas, commuting traffic is becoming a massive issue. Drivers commute the long distance to a town, patk n residential areas to avoid car parking charges and then make the final short trip by other means.
I know of one group who take it in turns to do this. All 5 drive into Portsmouth, park in the residential area, get into one car and that then drives to the workplace. 80% savings on car parking charges!
In my old house we never parked immediately outside our house it was too narrow - the only time was literally to unload something heavy and then immediately move the car. However someone decided to park immediately outside our gate and due to the narrowness - up onto the pavement. I was working in the garden and heard her congratulate herself to her companion on her excellent parking. So I checked with her it was ok to scratch her car when I took out either my bike or the buggy (can't remember which it was) when I left in 10 mins time. She promptly moved the car! And no I couldn't of got out the gate without scratching her car - probably quite badly.
Looking at the original image my immediate thought is trying to walk with a buggy and a toddler - it would be a nightmare. The toddler would be unable to walk beside you and would be unseen by any car driver. We are a one car family - you can share a car. If you are very short of money then it makes sense. At the opposite end of the spectrum I know friends who live in large houses with off street parking in the front garden who share a car with their neighbour or hire a car as necessary and saves money as a result.