Yes, but the key word there is "eventually" - we're not talking about the families of five deciding to uproot, we're talking about where the kids go when they've grown up and want jobs. In the short term, surely it's better to change the behaviours that can easily be changed?Increasing the cost of car ownership inevitably hits poorer people hardest and affects people living in rural areas to a greater extent but subsidies and unequal taxation is unsustainable, surely eventually people will be forced to make choices about where they can afford to live, work and socialise based on transport availability which will force people to adjust their lifestyles to use public transport and encourage alternative methods?
I don't know, but I live in London and it doesn't seem to have had that effect here.Wouldn't urban road pricing and taxing city parking tend to move jobs and people out of town centres with no obvious benefit for either.
(I noticed we both used the word "surely" there. Not sure what that says ;-)