Good morning,
To me the Guardian article reads like one written by someone with an agenda more than a thoughtful piece of journalism.
A document sent out to Evans staff says management will also have to work more hours. They will move from 40-hour contracts to 45 hours,
I would be interested to know if in reality this is true (my bold) or if the changes to the contracts actually reflect the reality.
I often walk through the town centre at 5am and it is easy to be surprised by just how many shops are open/opening to receive stock. It would seem reasonable to expect that the shop staff would be managers whatever their job title actually calls them.
but all other store staff will be switched from fixed-hours contracts, which usually guarantee at least eight hours a week, to what it calls “casual worker agreements” – Frasers’ term for zero-hours contracts.
How many people would find a guaranteed 8 hours over zero really that different?
If these 8 hours are one day a week, say Saturday/mid week day (cover full time staff) and the reality is that they aren't being offered, then the 8 hour guarantee is actually pretty meaningless as it would be replaced with redundancy within a few weeks anyway.
Many, many businesses have used contracts that are effectively zero hours since at least when I left school, but in the past employment law was more relaxed so that they were never written or perceived that way.
In this context Mike Ashley is getting a bad press because he is being completely honest and open, it may be unwise as it highlights practices that many won't approve of, but are hardly unique to his operations.
Bye
Ian