Leaway2
Lycrist
- Location
- Manchester (Sale)
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
I think Guy commented on that, he said he felt the rear let go on the previous corner & said that had he been in control he would have backed off, but presumably the algorithm didn't take that into account.What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
Circuit programmed into the cars computer, along with the braking points.What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
the algorithm didn't take that into account.
https://www.cyclechat.net/threads/drivers-and-mini-roundabouts.227312/#post-5059232I was wondering what would happen if 3 or 4 automated cars arrived at a roundabout from different directions at the same time.
A Mexican standoff?
I was surprised that Guy didn't think about it, he would never go out full blat on his way to the grid, or when road racing they keep the tyre warmers on until the very last secondThat is what surprised me. That the designers of such complex software didn’t incorporate this. Yes I know it is the design phase, but getting round corners must be the main consideration. This is a track so avoiding object is not relevant.
Circuit programmed into the cars computer, along with the braking points.
They then upped the speed and thats when it failed.
Do you think it's appropriate and/or safe to exceed 60mph on a road which if you're lucky was designed for the consequences of a reasonably predictable crash at 60mph and if you're unlucky was the best guess at shoehorning a NSL carriageway into an existing highway back when cars didn't accelerate as quickly and hasn't had its limit revised downwards yet?no it's not, inappropriate speed is
No arguement from me over this
Not if there is nobody else there.
Competing operating system manufacturers standardising protocols? That's not always worked out well...Ideally they should be talking to each other already, and timing their respective arrivals so as to all be able to continue without stopping at all.
As previously stated this is well off topic, but without knowing the road, the conditions at the time, it is not possible to answer.Snip
Top tip: if you don't want to be challenged on your "safespeed" arguments, don't make them.As previously stated this is well off topic, but without knowing the road, the conditions at the time, it is not possible to answer.
Top tip: If you wish to discuss it start a new threadTop tip: if you don't want to be challenged on your "safespeed" arguments, don't make them.
So, if I understand you correctly, what you would like to do is make unsubstantiated assertions regarding road safety, and complain when people pick you up on it.Top tip: If you wish to discuss it start a new thread