Guy Martin v The Robot Car

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Leaway2

Lycrist
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
 
D

Deleted member 26715

Guest
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
I think Guy commented on that, he said he felt the rear let go on the previous corner & said that had he been in control he would have backed off, but presumably the algorithm didn't take that into account.
 

BoldonLad

Not part of the Elite
Location
South Tyneside
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?

In the handbook of a BMW I once owned, the explanation relating to the ABS, Traction Control etc... included the phrase "this equipment does not allow the driver to ignore the laws of Physics".
 

classic33

Leg End Member
What surprised me was the fact that the car span so quickly. I would have thought that sensors would notice the lack of traction and made adjustments to speed/brakes/direction before it happened. ABS?
Circuit programmed into the cars computer, along with the braking points.

They then upped the speed and thats when it failed.
 

Leaway2

Lycrist
the algorithm didn't take that into account.

That is what surprised me. That the designers of such complex software didn’t incorporate this. Yes I know it is the design phase, but getting round corners must be the main consideration. This is a track so avoiding object is not relevant.
 
D

Deleted member 26715

Guest
That is what surprised me. That the designers of such complex software didn’t incorporate this. Yes I know it is the design phase, but getting round corners must be the main consideration. This is a track so avoiding object is not relevant.
I was surprised that Guy didn't think about it, he would never go out full blat on his way to the grid, or when road racing they keep the tyre warmers on until the very last second
 

Leaway2

Lycrist
Circuit programmed into the cars computer, along with the braking points.

They then upped the speed and thats when it failed.

It has to be more complex than just putting braking points in. The conditions, road position could change each time.
 

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
no it's not, inappropriate speed is
No arguement from me over this
Not if there is nobody else there.
Do you think it's appropriate and/or safe to exceed 60mph on a road which if you're lucky was designed for the consequences of a reasonably predictable crash at 60mph and if you're unlucky was the best guess at shoehorning a NSL carriageway into an existing highway back when cars didn't accelerate as quickly and hasn't had its limit revised downwards yet?

Do you only care about road users and not those of us living in houses within striking distance of a carriageway? And not wildlife or flora or infrastructure?
 
Top Bottom