ColinJ
Puzzle game procrastinator!
- Location
- Todmorden - Yorks/Lancs border
A bit of a has-bean ...?He doesn't do flesh, he's a vegan.

A bit of a has-bean ...?He doesn't do flesh, he's a vegan.
Top troll, and nobody even called you out on it since they were too busy arguing with the other guy...Please note that I whistled - and am gratified that an enthusiast responded - and away we went - 9 pages!
I will just assume you are just trolling - please put a smiley in so we know this. What treaded tyres do you run on your road bike, or are they treadless?
Thought I'd see what had been said about these tyres. Surprised you did not include the text immediately below the review (that you got the image from).I use these Road bike tyre's with tread on the road bikes at present.
Try it, then come back and tell us what you think.Thought I'd see what had been said about these tyres. Surprised you did not include the text immediately below the review (that you got the image from).
"slick (but not bald) treads offer the most convincing grip, especially when it's raining dogs and you're blasting through the bends. However, manufacturers recognise that patterns are psychologically reassuring."
Bit surprised you are running this rugged bargain basement tyre on Cosmics.
View attachment 356565
BTwin Resist 9 Road Bike Tyre 700X25
BTwin's Resist 9 Road Bike Tyre is a rugged bargain basement 700x25c complete with puncture-preventing belts, 60tpi casings and deep, water-channelling tread.
At first glance, the tread pattern of the Resist 9 looks quite aggressive, especially by contemporary tastes, and similar to that found on Vittoria's Randonneur series. Given that bicycles don't aquaplane, slick (but not bald) treads offer the most convincing grip, especially when it's raining dogs and you're blasting through the bends. However, manufacturers recognise that patterns are psychologically reassuring.
I had a pair of these Giant P-SL2 which were sold as specific to front and rear, which came on a bike I bought. Seems the tread compound was meant to be the difference. I do not recommend these tyres. First one then the other developed a side bulge: the diagonal carcass threads had failed - to the extent that the bulge started rubbing on the fork. Having made it home and replaced it, foolishly I did not replace its twin on the rear: same mode of failure 1500km later when it started fouling the seatstay - saved by a local bike shop.can you get front and rear specific tyres for bicycles?.
Not all of them. It depends on the compound.Slick motorcycle tyres are like plasticine, you can dig your nails in and pull chunks of the compound off the tyre when cold!
It's all about tyre compound on a bike, and even on MTB's I believe !
.
Continental sell them as a pairInteresting thread!, can you get front and rear specific tyres for bicycles?.
I'm afraid Schwalbe has it right, but for the wrong reason. In friction, the contact area is irrelevant. Fr= mu x Fn There is no provision for area in the formula.
OK, you both lose a mark for not properly defining your terms, but what I'm more interested in is the chemical reaction between rubber and tarmac. How does that work then?You believe wrong. The critical metric is 'mu'. mu is most influenced by compound, but the chemical reaction between the rubber and the tarmac, is also drastically effected by whether or not the compound is in direct contact with the tarmac. Anything that helps move water away from the contact patch helps dramatically. It's particularly noticeable with braking and acceleration in a straight line. If you cane it into a corner on a slick, under braking, and do the same on a treaded tyre, the outcomes are going to be different. How you deal with it is also going to vary, but the bottom line is, mu is increased if the contact patch is directly attatched to the tarmac.
The 'nd' figure ( stress corrosion coefficients) are different. The front tyre is designed to cope with more deformations ( due to steering trail, as well as the accelerations that the rear is subject to). The front tyre should have a higher 'nd' than the rear tyre. Again it's casting pearls before swine, for the most part, but if you know what you're doing, the difference, should be advantageous.I had a pair of these Giant P-SL2 which were sold as specific to front and rear, which came on a bike I bought. Seems the tread compound was meant to be the difference. I do not recommend these tyres. First one then the other developed a side bulge: the diagonal carcass threads had failed - to the extent that the bulge started rubbing on the fork. Having made it home and replaced it, foolishly I did not replace its twin on the rear: same mode of failure 1500km later when it started fouling the seatstay - saved by a local bike shop.
"This new folding-bead slick tyre from Giant grips and handles well in a variety of conditions, with some clever features that lifts it above run-of-the-mill general purpose rubber. The tread compound is different front and rear – softer and grippier up front, more hard-wearing in the rear."
That's the thing that makes the tyre work. It's a base principle, without it, the tyre can't work. I could go hunting for the relavant abstracts, but I can't be arsed.OK, you both lose a mark for not properly defining your terms, but what I'm more interested in is the chemical reaction between rubber and tarmac. How does that work then?