roubaixtuesday
self serving virtue signaller
all the other improvements it makes to the road environment for those not in vehicles.
THIS!!!
all the other improvements it makes to the road environment for those not in vehicles.
Totally get this, completely understand the logic, but what it also says is that there is a threshold death rate that is acceptable. One person in ten is OK to die. The line not shown is the one that says "Not hit by a vehicle traveling at any speed - 10 out of 10 pedestrians survive". Reducing speed minimises the risks, but is that it? Are there also actions put in place to prevent pedestrians being hit by vehicles? Reducing a speed limit is relatively quick and easy but it isn't the only solution and certainly isn't the ultimate solution.
For balance, I responded to the consultation about implementing a 20 mph speed limit in my village, in support. It has subsequently been enacted along with many more around my way and I do my best to adhere when in the car or on the motorbike. On bicycles I have been known to go faster based on my own dynamic risk assessment.
What that graphic doesn't show is that the lower limit also reduces the number of pedestrians hit in the first place, because the vehicle takes half as long again to reach them when they step in front of said vehicle.
Right, so a smaller proportion of a smaller population get killed - understood, and this can only be a good thing. But if this is the ONLY intervention then that one person in ten still has to die.
Had a bit of banter with someone in the pub last night. I'd overheard him talking to the barmaid about cramming for an exam and getting a "b". Slightly nosily, I enquires what he'd done, intending to congratulate him on his result. Turned out it was his O-level in whatever back in the day, and he said they used to write in chalk on slates back then. I was even older than him so responded that we'd written in cuneiform on wax tablets and didn't have slates in my day
Wax, WAX! You were lucky to have wax...we 'ad it tough etc. etc....
What that graphic doesn't show is that the lower limit also reduces the number of pedestrians hit in the first place, because the vehicle takes half as long again to reach them when they step in front of said vehicle.
A side benefit of lower speed limits is it makes it easy for anyone turning out of a side road to do so. Always amuses me when that car that cannot possibly drive that slowly suddenly brakes and turns into a side street. Just hope when they try to turn back out the road is full of speeders.
In a similar vein I was once told that at 30mph if you drive at 30mph if a pedestrian steps out from behind the front of a stationary bus at the same instant you pass the back, not only will you hit them, you will not even have touched the brakes, so will hit them at 30!
I didn't believe this, but when I worked it from scratch it is true
Is that a compulsory requirement on a bus in Germany? The only time UK ones tend to do that is when they have broken down.This explains why we are supposed to drove at 7km/h past busses showing their hazard lights at bus stops here.
Is that a compulsory requirement on a bus in Germany? The only time UK ones tend to do that is when they have broken down.